自拍校园亚洲欧美另类,中文字幕久久精品无码,寂寞骚妇被后入式爆草抓爆,深夜A级毛片免费视频

尼日利亞法院因不合格輪胎判決兩名中國(guó)人入獄

Court Remands Two Chinese in Prison over Substandard Tyres

拉各斯聯(lián)邦高等法院周一下令將兩名中國(guó)公民和尼日利亞人的監(jiān)禁還押，他們被指控進(jìn)口價(jià)值約五十億歐元的不合格汽車輪胎進(jìn)入該國(guó)。

    莫伊索拉·奧拉奧托貢法官在駁回被告之后不久就提出還押令，四次被起訴。被聯(lián)邦總檢察長(zhǎng)兼司法部長(zhǎng)控告的被告人是沈濤浪，徐靜瑤，Chinedu Madubuike。他們與兩家公司Sino Nigeria Limited和Nedeca International Limited進(jìn)行了交涉。 被列為第五被告的Madubuike作為他的律師，Napoleon Nwachukwu先生缺席審訊，告訴法庭被告人“嚴(yán)重”生病。

    在四項(xiàng)指控中，聯(lián)邦政府指責(zé)中國(guó)人及其所謂的同伙合謀“自行進(jìn)口輪胎，不符合尼日利亞有關(guān)工業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”。據(jù)稱這些被告人將各種尺寸的輪胎說(shuō)成另一種， 聯(lián)邦政府說(shuō)，這種行為對(duì)尼日利亞人民已經(jīng)構(gòu)成了危險(xiǎn)。 被告據(jù)說(shuō)是在2017年2月犯了所謂的罪行。

    這一行為違反了“2005年尼日利亞聯(lián)合會(huì)法”2015年第14號(hào)“組織法”第26（2）（b）（iii）條第26（2）（b）（iii）條，AGF的起訴律師Yusuff Lawan先生說(shuō) 。但是，由尼日利亞中華人民共和國(guó)中央高等專委會(huì)的Fred Guichu Zhong向中國(guó)公民解釋了這些指控后，被告就不認(rèn)罪，他們的尼日利亞同伙被告同樣沒(méi)有認(rèn)罪。

    檢察官Lawan根據(jù)他們的請(qǐng)求，敦促Olatoregun法官確定開(kāi)始審訊的日期，并指出，檢方有四名證人要求證明指控。 中方律師Victor Opara先生表示，他并不反對(duì)在審訊期間進(jìn)行祈禱，而是向法官通報(bào)了兩名獨(dú)立的保釋申請(qǐng)。

    Opara表示，法院在保釋方面所考慮的一切是確保被告人可以自由審判。 他呼吁法官對(duì)聯(lián)邦政府的反對(duì)派而給予他的保釋，他說(shuō)，他更多地關(guān)注犯罪的嚴(yán)重性。 但檢察官Lawan堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為，法院應(yīng)拒絕中國(guó)人的保釋申請(qǐng)。

    就第四，五被告Nwachukwu的律師本人而言，他已經(jīng)為他客戶提交了保釋申請(qǐng)，并補(bǔ)充說(shuō)，他作為檢察官也會(huì)這樣。

    他補(bǔ)充說(shuō)，附有五名被告的醫(yī)療報(bào)告，表明他目前病情嚴(yán)重，Nwachukwu敦促法官根據(jù)自己的無(wú)罪推定給予保釋。

    但檢察官Lawan說(shuō)，他需要時(shí)間來(lái)回復(fù)第4和第5被告的保釋申請(qǐng)。 他補(bǔ)充說(shuō)，他需要核實(shí)附帶的醫(yī)療報(bào)告，據(jù)他介紹，這是一家私立醫(yī)院發(fā)放的。 Lawan要求押后向第四和第五被告的保釋申請(qǐng)?zhí)岢隹诠?/span>

聽(tīng)完所有律師的意見(jiàn)后，奧拉奧托倫法官休庭至星期二，以便Lawan的第四和第五被告向保釋申請(qǐng)?zhí)峁┛诠?，并在法庭上作出同樣的辯護(hù)，之后將以保釋方式作出一般裁定 所有被告的申請(qǐng)。之后，將對(duì)所有被告保釋申請(qǐng)作出一般性裁定。

    不過(guò)，法官命令將被告還押在監(jiān)獄內(nèi)，等待確定保釋申請(qǐng)。

The Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday ordered the prison remand of two Chinese nationals and a Nigerian who were accused of importing sub-standard automobile tyres worth about N5bn into the country.

Justice Mojisola Olatoregun made the remand order shortly after the accused were arraigned before her on four counts charge. The accused, who were arraigned by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, are Taolung Shen, Xu Jing Yao and Chinedu Madubuike. They were arraigned alongside two companies, Sino Nigeria Limited and Nedeca International Limited. Madubuike, who was listed as the fifth defendant, was arraigned in absentia as his counsel, Mr. Napoleon Nwachukwu, informed the court that the accused was “seriously” sick.

In the four charges, the Federal Government accused the Chinese and their alleged accomplices of conspiring “among yourselves to import tyres, which did not meet the relevant Nigeria industrial standards.” The accused persons were said to have allegedly stuffed various sizes of tyres into one another, an act, the Federal Government said, constituted a danger to the Nigerian populace. The defendants were said to have committed the alleged offence sometime in the month of February 2017.

The offence, the prosecuting counsel for the AGF, Mr. Yusuff Lawan said, is contrary to and punishable under Section 26 (2)(b)(iii) of the Standards Organisation Act No. 14, 2015 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.

However, when the charges were read and interpreted to the Chinese citizens by one Fred Guichu Zhong, from the Chinese High Commission in Nigeria, the defendants pleaded not guilty. Their Nigerian co-defendants equally pleaded not guilty.

Following their plea, the prosecutor, Lawan, urged Justice Olatoregun to fix a date for commencement of trial, adding that the prosecution had four witnesses to call to prove the charges. Counsel for the Chinese, Mr. Victor Opara, said he was not opposed to the prayer for a trial date but notified the judge of two separate bail applications for his clients.

Moving the applications, Opara said all that the court would consider in granting bail was the assurance that the defendants would make themselves available for trial. He urged the judge to discountenance the opposition of the Federal Government to his clients’ bail, which, he said, dwelt more on the gravity of the offence. But the prosecutor, Lawan, insisted that the court should refuse the bail applications by the Chinese.

On his own part, counsel for the 4th and 5th defendants, Nwachukwu, also said he had filed bail applications for his clients, adding that he had served same on the prosecutor.

He added that medical reports on the fifth defendants were attached to show that he “is seriously sick currently.” Nwachukwu urged the judge to grant his clients bail based on their presumption of innocence.

But the prosecutor, Lawan, said he needed time to reply to the bail applications by the 4th and 5th defendants. He added that he needed to verify the attached medical reports, which, according to him, were issued by a private hospital. Lawan sought an adjournment to file a counter-affidavit to the 4th and 5th defendants’ bail applications.

After listening to all the counsel, Justice Olatoregun adjourned till Tuesday to enable Lawan to file and serve his counter-affidavits to the bail applications by the 4th and 5th defendants and argue same in court, after which a general ruling would be delivered on the bail applications by all the defendants.

The judge, however, ordered that the defendants should be remanded in the prison custody pending the determination of their bail applications.

具體問(wèn)題請(qǐng)咨詢NormalTCI諾莫檢測(cè)

全國(guó)統(tǒng)一服務(wù)熱線:400-6177-880

Email:service@normaltci.com